In today's society, is an environmentally friendly fashion. But it seems that the academicians do not have to rush this fashion, so that we can not say that Jiang Youxu Academy of Sciences in order to make the eye and show. Despite a few days ago, organized by the China City Forum on Forests, he called on the Government's carbon dioxide emissions from the public's call for the introduction of eco-taxes have led to much criticism, making him famous.
Eco-tax is not a new thing. Many countries, such as the Netherlands, Sweden, Finland and so on, the introduction of this tax. Keen to advance the cause of environmental protection, former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, but also to advocate carbon-free way of life, thereby reducing the carbon dioxide gas emissions. At the same time, referred to as a "carbon neutral" environmental action became popular in the West, its meaning is that people calculate their daily activities, either directly or indirectly made carbon dioxide emissions, and calculate the carbon dioxide they needed to offset the economic cost And then pay the individual enterprise or specialized agencies, through their tree-planting or other environmental protection projects in the atmosphere to offset the amount of carbon dioxide. We guess, is probably the Academy would like to introduce this concept and way of life, with a view to China's environmental protection work there is a significant promotion.
Academician Jiang did not know is not there to be an ivory tower too long, that is 20 yuan can be as small as negligible figure. Because of the so-called "carbon dioxide emissions from the public collection of ecological tax" is actually a poll tax. As long as people breathe carbon dioxide emissions will be, and this is our biological nature of the decision, scheduled one day live one day.
However, even in the West, "Carbon Neutral" It seems that their own thing, why on China to "poll tax"? Because the Chinese people unconsciously? I am afraid, not really conscious or certain enterprises. Fellow board the brick children who should smoky chimneys, spray pipelines Xiushui, surreptitious release poisonous gas companies to shoot. On the contrary, in 2006, China's GDP unit energy consumption and emissions of major pollutants has not reached the goal. Premier Wen Jiabao said that this "I was very disturbing."
Are the people of the introduction of eco-tax on the prime minister will allow you peace of mind? People from the pocket The easy money, but also the least Kaopu to be passed on to all the problems underlying the public body to cover a number of companies to evade responsibility for Enron, get its eggs is no different. Financial crisis, the central authorities have repeatedly introduced tax measures to encourage people join hands to overcome the hard times. Fellow country wishing to share, it is best not to fight the poll tax idea.
Eco-tax is not a new thing. Many countries, such as the Netherlands, Sweden, Finland and so on, the introduction of this tax. Keen to advance the cause of environmental protection, former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, but also to advocate carbon-free way of life, thereby reducing the carbon dioxide gas emissions. At the same time, referred to as a "carbon neutral" environmental action became popular in the West, its meaning is that people calculate their daily activities, either directly or indirectly made carbon dioxide emissions, and calculate the carbon dioxide they needed to offset the economic cost And then pay the individual enterprise or specialized agencies, through their tree-planting or other environmental protection projects in the atmosphere to offset the amount of carbon dioxide. We guess, is probably the Academy would like to introduce this concept and way of life, with a view to China's environmental protection work there is a significant promotion.
Academician Jiang did not know is not there to be an ivory tower too long, that is 20 yuan can be as small as negligible figure. Because of the so-called "carbon dioxide emissions from the public collection of ecological tax" is actually a poll tax. As long as people breathe carbon dioxide emissions will be, and this is our biological nature of the decision, scheduled one day live one day.
However, even in the West, "Carbon Neutral" It seems that their own thing, why on China to "poll tax"? Because the Chinese people unconsciously? I am afraid, not really conscious or certain enterprises. Fellow board the brick children who should smoky chimneys, spray pipelines Xiushui, surreptitious release poisonous gas companies to shoot. On the contrary, in 2006, China's GDP unit energy consumption and emissions of major pollutants has not reached the goal. Premier Wen Jiabao said that this "I was very disturbing."
Are the people of the introduction of eco-tax on the prime minister will allow you peace of mind? People from the pocket The easy money, but also the least Kaopu to be passed on to all the problems underlying the public body to cover a number of companies to evade responsibility for Enron, get its eggs is no different. Financial crisis, the central authorities have repeatedly introduced tax measures to encourage people join hands to overcome the hard times. Fellow country wishing to share, it is best not to fight the poll tax idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment