Huang filed a lawsuit next week to claim ASUS

Asustek Computer problems continue to claim to the 5,000,000 U.S. dollars have been detained on suspicion of extortion 294 days by 29,000 yuan compensation for the country ---

By yesterday afternoon, "ASUS extortion cases of injustice," Huang parties from the hands of an agent to get the Haidian Procuratorate issued a written decision on compensation for the country. According to the records, she will receive 29197.14 yuan of state compensation.

This morning, an agent of Zhou Yu Huang told reporters that next week they are prepared to prosecute ASUS, but the exact amount of their claims has not been finalized.

The "criminal compensation decisions" in the records, as a result of Huang's made its decision not to prosecute in order to have been wrongly arrested on grounds of violation of their personal freedom, to apply for compensation, according to the "State Compensation Law," the relevant provisions of, access to state compensation The right to compensation is Huang's decision since March 8, 2006 to December 26, 2006 was 294 days in custody in damages, for a total of 29197.14 yuan.

It is understood that after Huang's Haidian to the criminal compensation applications, the requirement to pay compensation to 46855.62 yuan. In response, Huang Zhou Yu's agent explained that their application is based on the amount of workers in Beijing in 2007 on the calculation of the average wage, and the Prosecutor's Office in accordance with the national average wage of workers on the standard.

Huang said that although the amount of compensation requested by less than that, but she's been very satisfied with the decision, as it has proven that they are not extortion, was innocent.

Lawyers said Zhang Ping, Huang decided not subject to reconsideration request, Haidian District Prosecutor's Office should be one month after the payment of compensation.

In a reporter's question, the ASUS Adeline Wong at the mention of the current attitude and their own lives, they shed tears. In her view, "This is not the final victory." She told reporters that in the near future, she will certainly carry out ASUS prosecuted on the grounds that the prosecution of consumer fraud and falsely accused.

Huang agent: ASUS to be indicted next week

The newspaper interviewed Huang Zhou Yu's agent.

FW (late Law): What time are you going to sue ASUS?

Zhou Yu: We are ready to prosecute in the next week, at present mainly due to the amount of the claim we have not yet been finalized.

FW: What made you prepare this kind of claim?

Zhou Yu: This is me and Huang face an embarrassing problem. Huang and I want to be 5,000,000 U.S. dollars in punitive damages. After all, because we had to 5,000,000 U.S. dollars out of things, but since has been identified as innocent, we are afraid what? To that end I have to advocate 5,000,000 U.S. dollars.

FW: You mentioned the embarrassment of What does this mean?

Zhou Yu: We have consulted the court, if you really want to 5,000,000 U.S. dollars if required to pay 400,000 yuan in legal fees. But according to some of the existing laws and regulations, the final court verdict may be a pay-back ASUS. I mean it spent 400,000 yuan of costs, and ultimately back to a laptop computer.

My name is win, win in a verdict on; in fact I lost, lost in the litigation costs.

Huang lawyers: 5,000,000 would like to claim can be understood

This morning, our telephone connection is a business trip of the incident ASUS lawyer Zhang Ping Huang, he made a specific amount of compensation for his views.

FW: Zhou Yu and Huang on the amount of compensation and whether or not you have the exchange of lawyers?

Zhang Ping: We also talked about the cost of litigation and might come out of proportion. But, after all, claim they want to 5,000,000 U.S. dollars of litigation is understandable motives, those who suffer in this eat 5,000,000 U.S. dollars, since the not guilty, do not ah?

FW: Do you support the amount of compensation they request it?

Zhang Ping: I just want to say that, first, the problem we have not yet finalized, and so I need to go back and the parties before finalizing the amount of the claim.

Secondly, I have been advocating that claim to be rational, it is necessary to grasp the laws of the current compensation standards, in a rational manner to safeguard their rights to at least the cost of litigation to be the biggest outcome of the proceedings, and this is what a lawyer would give the party the most With a reasonable proposal.